Thursday, March 11, 2010

A brief discourse on Occupational safety

A brief discourse on Occupational safety

From Dr Hsu's blog

( I may stop political bloggings but i shall talk more on socio economic issues, since to some die hard fanatics that I do not qualify to speak on the shortcomings of the present govenrment. Today, I shall talk about an area which I have some expertise and which I may be as good as anyone in the country at least where theory is concerned.)

There is a branch of medicine that is called occupational medicine, which treats occupational diseases, a big term for workplace illnesses and accidents. It has evolved to include prevention of accidents and occupational diseases, and adoption of safety measures and procedures to reduce the risk of workplace diseases and accidents. It has thus evolved to covered what is now known as Occupational Safety and Health (OSH).

A simple example is ‘low backache’ due to a sitting in a badly designed chair. So for clerical staff and typists and receptionists, they need to be provided with ergonomically designed chairs to prevent low backache. In fact, low backache among office workers are very common , and in most cases, are due to badly designed chairs which encourage bad postures and slouching.

Central to occupational safety is what we called “hazards”.Hazards are things with potential of causing sickness and accidents. For example, a pot hole in the ground is a hazard, for anyone walking or riding a bike over the pot hole may end up in a nasty fall and sustain injuries.

So to safety specialists , the main theme is to remove hazards wherever it is possible.

In the example of a pot hole, the hazard can be removed by repairing the pothole. But at times, the hazard may not be easily removed. For example, the pothole cannot be repaired in time for certain reasons, the hazard can be replaced by a lesser hazard, for example putting a tong in front of the pothole so that people would not walk directly into it. By itself, a tong in the walkway or a drive is also hazardous, but since it is more visible, it can be used temporarily to reduce the risk of a more serious hazard, that is the pothole.

Some times a hazard cannot be removed. Night driving is a form of hazard since night is the time when our body needs sleep and rest, apart from decreased visibility. Since this is the type of hazrd that cannot be removed, we need to formulate procedures to reduce the potential of accidents during night driving. Procedures such as ensuring the vehicles have sufficient lights to illuminate the roads, procedures on checking the braking systems, procedures ensuring that all seats belts are being fastened before the vehicle can be given the nod to move.

There must be procedures to ensure that the driver is healthy at that time of driving ( not just at that time of medical checkup which is required by law once a year only). If the driver reports that he is not well, there must be replacement for him. There must also be procedures that the driver has sufficient sleep. If the driver has not enough sleep, he should be replaced.

Then there must be procedures that after certain minutes of driving, the driver needs to stop over to rest. Some times just to stop to break the monotonousness of driving. Lets face it. All jobs, in the eyes of occupational speicialists, are repetitive and all repetitive jobs will become monotonous.

Once a job becomes monotonous, the risk of accidents increased ten folds, since monotony leads to boredom and boredom leads to sleepiness or decrease in alertness and reaction time.

The same safety procedures are adopted by airlines for their pilots. For those of you who have followed National Geographic channel’s ‘air crash investigation’, there were a few instances where investigators found that pilot errors were the cause of air crashes, and in most of these instances, pilot fatigue leading to judgement errors were the causes.

Looking at the Malaysian scenerio, most companies do not have any occupational safety measures or procedures. The onus is on the company management to provide such measures or procedures.

In the case of bus drivers or drivers of other public service vehicles such as taxis, they do go for the once a year medical examination. But passing the medical examination does not guarantee the health of the driver involved. He may be healthy and alert at the time of medical examination, but he may suffer from lack of sleep a week later which leads to decrease in alertness and hence increases the risk of accidents.

So it is not enough just to send drivers for a yearly medical check up. The company must adopt a policy of ensuring the safety of their passengers and workers, and once the safety policy is spelt out, there must be program to implement the policy; program such as safety procedures which everyone must adhere to.

So there must be procedures to ensure that the drivers have enough rest between trips. There must a procedure to educate the driver to report any lack of sleep and sleepiness.. Driver fatigue is the main cause of bus acccidents. The drivers must also report any unusual sounds coming from the vehicles .

But companies would not take the initiatives to put in safety program and safety procedures. The onus is for the government to legislate laws and rules to enforce them to adopt such safety procedures. And laws must be enforced for them to be effective. There must be adequate surveillance to ensure that all laws and safety procedures are adhered to.

Besides that, litigation from the victims of accidents (or victims’ families) will serve as a motivation for the companies to adopt safety procedures. If each accident victim sues the bus company and driver for negligence after an accident caused by lack of such safety procedures, the companies will learn the hard way to adopt and implement such procedures.

SO victims in workplaces, get a lawyer to sue and you will help to prevent the occurrence of accidents in future.

( The writer is writing on occupation safety , a subject which he has some expertise and hopefully more employers will realise the importance of adopting safety measures for their staff…It is actually more cost effective to have a safe workplace,including vehicles, since with accident payouts and increase insurance premium, it would be cheaper to provide staff with safety measures, as in Australia and other western countries where every business with more than 15 staff must have occupational safety policy and program to implement safety procedures. On top of cost, the most important thing is of course human lives, once lost cannot be replaced).

next i shall talk about the US flight 253 where safety procedures were breached at Amterdam airport, one of the airports with the best security procedures..

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Alat Pengesan Laju Akan Dipasang Pada Semua Kenderaan JKJR

Alat Pengesan Laju Akan Dipasang Pada Semua Kenderaan JKJR

NILAI, 20 Feb (Bernama) -- Jabatan Keselamatan Jalan Raya (JKJR) akan memasang alat pengesan kelajuan pada semua kenderaan jabatan itu di seluruh negara bagi membolehkan kelajuan sesebuah kenderaan dikesan dari dalam kenderaan JKJR.

Ketua Pengarah JKJR Datuk Suret Singh berkata alat yang dikenali sebagai sistem pemantauan kelajuan itu turut dilengkapi 'penembak laser' dan akan diguna untuk operasi rambang mensasarkan bas ekspres.

"Ini sebagai usaha advokasi kempen keselamatan jalan raya," katanya kepada pemberita selepas memantau penggunaan sistem pemantauan kelajuan bas di Hentian Rehat dan Rawat Nilai (arah Selatan), Lebuhraya Utara-Selatan dekat sini pada Sabtu.

Beliau berkata kenderaan JKJR yang dipasang alat pengesan kelajuan itu akan mengekori bas serta merekod kelajuannya dan jika ia melebihi had laju, pegawai akan menahan bas terbabit seterusnya memberi ceramah kepada pemandu sebelum rekod itu dihantar kepada syarikat bas berkenaan dan Lembaga Pelesenan Kenderaan Perdagangan (LPKP) untuk tindakan lanjut.

Sementara itu, katanya Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia (LLM) telah mengarahkan semua syarikat konsesi menyediakan kenderaan tunda bagi mengalihkan kenderaan rosak termasuk bas dan lori dari tepi jalan dalam tempoh 15 hingga 20 minit bagi mengelakkan kemalangan.

Beliau berkata keputusan itu dibuat hasil perbincangan bersama LLM yang turut disertai syarikat konsesi minggu lepas.

"Sejak kebelakangan ini, kita dapati banyak kemalangan berlaku disebabkan kenderaan (rosak) yang diletak atau ditinggalkan di tepi jalan, jadi untuk mengelakkannya maka ia (kenderaan rosak) perlu dialihkan segera.

"Sebelum ini memang sudah ada kenderaan tunda di lebuh raya namun tiada garis panduan jelas mengenai tempoh masa yang perlu diambil untuk mengalihkannya, menyebabkan ia sering tersadai di tepi jalan untuk jangka masa agak lama," katanya.

Beliau berkata syarikat konsesi yang tidak mempunyai kenderaan tunda khas bagi kenderaan berat telah diarah melantik pihak ketiga untuk menyediakan perkhidmatan itu.

Dipetik dari laman web Bernama

Friday, February 26, 2010

Ciri Keselamatan Lori Cukup Untuk Elak Kemalangan - PMLOA

Ciri Keselamatan Lori Cukup Untuk Elak Kemalangan - PMLOA

KUALA LUMPUR, 19 Feb (Bernama) -- Persatuan Pemilik Lori Semalaysia (PMLOA) menegaskan bahawa kebanyakan lori sudah dilengkapi ciri-ciri keselamatan yang mencukupi untuk digunakan sewaktu kecemasan.

Presidennya Er Sui See berkata ini kerana selain lampu standard yang terdapat pada badan lori, setiap lori juga dilengkapi dengan reflektor (pemantul cahaya) yang membolehkan pemandu lain melihat lori dengan jelas terutamanya yang berhenti di tepi jalan.

"Reflektor yang dipasang pada badan lori ini sepatutnya sudah memadai kerana ia boleh dilihat dalam keadaan terang, gelap atau hujan lebat sekalipun," katanya ketika dihubungi Bernama Jumaat.

Beliau berkata pemasangan reflektor ini adalah mandatori dan setiap lori mesti memasang reflektor yang berukuran tiga meter sebagai salah satu ciri keselamatan tambahan.

"Bagaimanapun sekiranya terdapat pemandu lori yang gagal memasang reflektor ini, JPJ (Jabatan Pengangkutan Jalan) haruslah mengambil tindakan ke atas mereka kerana tindakan tersebut boleh mengakibatkan kemudaratan kepada pengguna jalan raya," katanya.

Er juga berkata orang ramai tidak seharusnya menyalahkan pemandu lori semata-mata apabila berlaku kemalangan sebaliknya turut melihat kepada faktor-faktor lain.

"Jika berlaku kemalangan, ada banyak faktor yang menyumbang terutamanya struktur jalan, cuaca serta keadaan pemandu itu sendiri sama ada mengantuk atau tidak.

"Seperti kemalangan di Plaza Tol Senawang baru-baru ini, keadaan persekitaran adalah terang dan treler tersebut juga diletakkan di lorong kecemasan. Bukannya di tengah jalan dan mengganggu pengguna lain," katanya.

Selain itu beliau juga berkata pihaknya akan mencadangkan kepada JPJ agar menguatkuasakan penggunaan kon bagi menggantikan segi tiga keselamatan yang digunakan sewaktu kecemasan.

"Pada pendapat kami penggunaan kon adalah lebih efisien kerana kon lebih mudah dilihat dari jarak jauh dan tidak mudah tumbang sekiranya ditiup angin," katanya.

Katanya walaupun penggunaan kon adalah lebih mahal berbanding segi tiga keselamatan, sekurang-kurangnya pemandu lain akan lebih peka akan bahaya yang menanti di hadapan mereka.

Sementara itu, Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Pengangkutan Jalan (JPJ) Datuk Solah Mat Hassan berkata pihaknya akan mengusahakan agar bilangan lampu pada badan lori dapat ditambah daripada jumlah yang sedia ada sekarang.

"Jika dibandingkan dengan saiz lori yang besar, kita akan lihat lampu itu kecil dan seperti tidak mencukupi untuk memberitahu pengguna jalan raya tentang kehadiran lori tersebut. Kita akan cuba perbaiki mutu dengan menambahkan lagi lampu dan meningkatkan kejelasannya," katanya ketika dihubungi Bernama.

Beliau berkata pemasangan reflektor sememangnya sudah termaktub dalam Kaedah-kaedah Kenderaan Motor (Pembinaan dan Penggunaan) 1959, dan kegagalan berbuat demikian boleh dikenakan kompaun RM300.

Solah berkata JPJ akan bekerjasama dengan PMLOA berhubung penggunaan kon sewaktu kecemasan dan akan memperbaiki lagi ciri-ciri kon daripada aspek saiz dan kejelasan kon.

"Kon merah putih yang digunakan sekarang akan diperbaiki dengan menjadikannya lutsinar agar dapat dilihat dengan lebih jelas terutamanya pada waktu malam," katanya.

Dipetik dari laman web Bernama

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Tiada Kecederaan Akibat Letupan Besar Di Loji Petronas Labuan

Tiada Kecederaan Akibat Letupan Besar Di Loji Petronas Labuan

LABUAN, 22 Feb (Bernama) -- Satu letupan besar berlaku di cerowong pembuangan gas terkawal (S1001 Flare Tip) Petronas Methanol Labuan (PML) pada Isnin, memaksa operasi di tapak loji minyak bernilai RM511 juta itu dihentikan.

Seramai 82 pekerja kontrak dan 46 petugas Petronas Methanol Labuan sedang bekerja di situ ketika letupan berlaku pada pukul 11.37 pagi tetapi tiada kecederaan dilaporkan.

Duah buah jentera bomba masing-masing dari Jabatan Bomba dan Penyelamat Labuan dan unit bomba penyelamat PML dikerah mengawal kebakaran akibat letupan tersebut, dan berjaya mengawal keadaan 30 minit kemudian.

Bercakap kepada satu sidang akhbar, ketua produksi PML Mohd Kamis Abdul Manap berkata siasatan terperinci akan dibuat bagi mengenal pasti punca letupan.

"Kita akan buat siasatan menyeluruh sebelum kerja-kerja dapat diteruskan di tapak loji ini. Ini adalah kejadian pertama berlaku di cerowong pembuangan gas asli terkawal ini. Kita akan mengenal pasti sama ada wujudnya kepincangan dalam aspek keselamatan," kata Mohd Kamis.

Petronas Methanol Labuan memiliki loji methanol yang dibina pada 1984 dan mampu menghasilkan 60,000 methanol setahun.

Pelanggan terbesar PML adalah loji propilena Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) di Kuantan, Pahang dengan keperluan tahunan sebanyak 110,000 tan.

Pasaran lain termasuklah Jepun, Indonesia, Filipina, Singapura, Thailand, Korea, Taiwan dan China.

Pada tahun 2007, dua pekerja sub-kontrak Petronas cedera parah terbakar dalam satu letupan ketika melaksanakan kerja pengimpalan di plant PML di Rancha-Rancha

Dipetik dari laman Bernama

Friday, February 19, 2010

Does Your Company Have A Safety And Health Policy?

If not, check this,

“Except in such cases as may be prescribed, it shall be the duty of every employer and every self-employed person to prepare and as often as may be appropriate revise a written statement of his general policy with respect to the safety and health at work of his employees and the organization and arrangements for the time being in force for carrying out that policy, and to bring the statement and any revision of it to the notice of his employees” (Section 16, Occupational Safety And Health Act 1994)

The relevant penalty is fine not exceeding fifty thousand Ringgit and/or jail not exceeding two years.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Ini Kisah Bas Ekspres

Mandatory course for express bus operators

ALOR SETAR: All 224 express bus operators will be required to attend a two-day Safety, Health and Environmental Management (SHE) course as part of the Commercial Vehicle Licensing Board’s (CVLB) new regulation.

CVLB chairman Datuk Halimah Mohamed Sadique said the course, starting on Feb 23, is to brief bus operators on the five requirements under SHE.

“SHE was added as part of the new licensing regulation for express buses following the Sani United Sdn Bhd bus accident which killed 10 people in Ipoh late last year.

“We issued a circular asking express bus operators to comply with SHE but later realised that most of them did not know the proper procedure to obtain a SHE certificate,” she said after chairing a dialogue with Kedah/Perlis taxi operators here yesterday.

Halimah said under SHE, the operators must properly manage their drivers, know bus trip risk factors and ensure their vehicles were regularly serviced.

“They will be given two weeks to implement what is required under SHE, and those who fail to comply after the given time will have action taken against them,” she said.

On another matter, she said that by March 1, taxi operators who failed to fix stickers displaying the new rates and informing commuters that the drivers were using meters would be issued a RM300 compound fine.

“If they continue to be stubborn, we will suspend and revoke their permits by the second or third offence,” she added.

Taken from The Star website

But several questions arise,

1. Is 2 day course enough for all the express bus operators? What about the obligatory trainings as per Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 and its subsidiary regulations?

2. CVLB chairman Datuk Halimah Mohamed Sadique said, "...most of them did not know the proper procedure to obtain a SHE certificate...". Why SHE certificate? Who issues the certificate? Is the certificate in compliance with international standards? Why not asking the companies to subsribe to OHSAS18001 and/or MS1722 standards instead?

3. What about Safety and Health Policy statement? Do all the 224 express bus companies have such policy and communicate the policy to their employees? Do the companies have safety and health committee at their workplace?

Monday, February 15, 2010

Fungsi-fungsi Jabatan Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan (JKKP)

Jabatan Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan (JKKP) atau dalam bahasa Inggerisnya Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) ialah sebuah jabatan di bawah Kementerian Sumber Manusia. Alamat ibupejabat JKKP ialah Department of Occupational Safety And Health, (Ministry of Human Resource), Level 2, 3 & 4, Block D3, Complex D,
Federal Government Administrative Centre, 62530 W. P. Putrajaya.JKKP juga mempunyai cawangan di setiap negeri. Di antara fungsi-fungsi asas JKKP ialah,

1. Menguatkuasakan Akta Kilang dan Jentera 1967 (Factories and Machinery Act 1967) dan Akta Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan 1994 (Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994).

2. Mengkaji perundangan sedia ada

3. Memberi khidmat nasihat dan kepakaran

4. Menjalankan kerja galakan dan promosi

5. Menjadi sekretariat kepada Majlis Negara Bagi Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan (National Council for OSH)